1967 article about long term follow up Erb's Palsy
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:54 pm
I may have posted this before, but I read through it again and they mention a rate or .38/1000. I always wondered where that number came from because it seems so out of whack with every other statistic I have ever read. It's amazing that treatments have rarely strayed from what they were doing 40-70 years ago.
I also found this paragraph interesting, considering that many many articles say a majority of injuries spontaneously recover, and is frequently reported as 90-95%:
Complete spontaneous recovery of function is hoped for in all patients, but it is impossible to predict which patient will recover fully and which will not. A wide difference in the incidence of complete recovery has been reported. Wickstrom found the incidence to be 13.4 per cent, whereas in our institution only 7 per cent recovered fully.
I also found this paragraph interesting, considering that many many articles say a majority of injuries spontaneously recover, and is frequently reported as 90-95%:
Complete spontaneous recovery of function is hoped for in all patients, but it is impossible to predict which patient will recover fully and which will not. A wide difference in the incidence of complete recovery has been reported. Wickstrom found the incidence to be 13.4 per cent, whereas in our institution only 7 per cent recovered fully.