Re: triangle tilt surgery
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:36 pm
EllenL:
The problem with your theory is that it just doesn't jibe with what the medical professionals themselves think is the prudent thing to do.
Our children don't have a simple broken bone, they have a complicated injury with lifelong implications. If YOU don't want to learn the intricacies that's fine, but you should listen to more than one doctor who HAS chosen to study those intricacies.
And your argument that those of us who seek multiple opinions don't have "better outcomes" has less to do with the number of opinions and more to do with the level of injury our child incurred and how well a particular course of action worked. Believe it or not, but not every person who seeks multiple opinions chooses surgery. And those who seek multiple opinions might get differing views on which surgeries would be helpful. And so they choose one. And hope for the best.
If my child were diagnosed with a life threatening disease, I would seek multiple opinions...and choose a course of action...and still the outcome might not be good. Granted, bpi is not life threatening, but why the choice to not get more information? Since most doctors will take videos for evaluation, where is the problem? I chose to go across the country, but the doctor I went to told me I could send a video. It doesn't has to cost a lot of money to talk to other doctors. But it does take some time. And frankly, that is time that I do choose to give to my bpi child. And the research that I did on epilepsy while my son had it, was worth the time there too. And what I learned at that time, was that my local neuro was doing the best thing that could be done.
I continue to believe that multiple opinions only serve us BETTER, not worse.
claudia
The problem with your theory is that it just doesn't jibe with what the medical professionals themselves think is the prudent thing to do.
Our children don't have a simple broken bone, they have a complicated injury with lifelong implications. If YOU don't want to learn the intricacies that's fine, but you should listen to more than one doctor who HAS chosen to study those intricacies.
And your argument that those of us who seek multiple opinions don't have "better outcomes" has less to do with the number of opinions and more to do with the level of injury our child incurred and how well a particular course of action worked. Believe it or not, but not every person who seeks multiple opinions chooses surgery. And those who seek multiple opinions might get differing views on which surgeries would be helpful. And so they choose one. And hope for the best.
If my child were diagnosed with a life threatening disease, I would seek multiple opinions...and choose a course of action...and still the outcome might not be good. Granted, bpi is not life threatening, but why the choice to not get more information? Since most doctors will take videos for evaluation, where is the problem? I chose to go across the country, but the doctor I went to told me I could send a video. It doesn't has to cost a lot of money to talk to other doctors. But it does take some time. And frankly, that is time that I do choose to give to my bpi child. And the research that I did on epilepsy while my son had it, was worth the time there too. And what I learned at that time, was that my local neuro was doing the best thing that could be done.
I continue to believe that multiple opinions only serve us BETTER, not worse.
claudia